Below is a brief overview of some aspects of the development process. It is not intended to be comprehensive or a substitute for legal or planning advice.
THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
Infill construction and renovations are governed by City zoning bylaws. Often the owner of the property – either an end-user or a developer – is seeking to exceed the limits of the bylaws with respect to height, depth, width or some combination of the three. Minor deviations from zoning bylaws – minor variances, changes to legal non-conforming uses (“permissions”) and land configuration (“consents”) – require an application to and approval by the City before a building permit will be issued. A variance is considered minor if it meets the four tests that have been established in the Planning Act: 1. Is the variance minor in size and impact? 2. Is it appropriate for development of the site? 3. Is the variance within the intent of the Official Plan? 4. Is the variance within the intent of the Zoning Bylaw?
Under The Planning Act Toronto City Council has appointed an administrative body known as the Committee of Adjustment to approve these applications.The Committee of Adjustment is divided into four small panels administered in the following districts: Etobicoke York, North York, Toronto and East York, Scarborough. North York Committee of Adjustment has jurisdiction over development in the Lytton Park area.
The City of Toronto has prepared a detailed brochure on the Committee of Adjustment:
City of Toronto Committee of Adjustment Brochure
LPRO has prepared a Guide with some useful general tips for residents going to the Committee of Adjustment: LPRO Tips for C of A
THE APPEAL PROCESS
If the applicant is denied by the Committee of Adjustment or if the applicant is successful and the person opposing the application wishes to challenge the Committee’s decision, either party can appeal. Most appeals must be made to the Toronto Local Appeals Board (TLAB), however decisions regarding certain types of application must be appealed to Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) – see below:
For information on TLAB see City of Toronto Public Guide to TLAB: City of Toronto TLAB Guide
For information on LPAT:
Ontario Citizens Guide to LPAT
THE PLANNING PROCESS AND LOCAL PLANNING APPEAL TRIBUNAL (LPAT)
When the proposed development does not meet the intent of the zoning bylaw or the Official Plan for the property, the developer needs to apply for a zoning bylaw amendment and/or Official Plan amendment. This is often the case for larger condominium developments, mixed-used buildings and even certain townhouse developments.
This process requires an application to City Planning and other departments and agencies for initial review. A preliminary report, written by the City Planner responsible for the file, is presented to the local Community Council identifying a preliminary set of issues to be addressed and directing the scheduling of a community consultation meeting. A community consultation meeting is held. City Planning continues to assess the application, comparing it to planning policies and taking into account community feedback. City Planning then presents a report to the local Community Council recommending that the application be approved or refused. The final decision is made by Toronto City Council. The Developer can appeal in two ways: if Community Council does not make a decision within the prescribed timeline or if City Council denies the application. Residents have the right to appeal if they disagree with Council’s decision, but this rarely occurs. The appeal body is Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT).
The Province’s former appeal body, the Ontario Municipal Board, was criticized for its wide-ranging authority to overrule City Council as this often favoured developers. In 2017 the Province of Ontario made changes to the appeals system. The Tribunal’s name was changed from “Ontario Municipal Board” to “Local Planning Appeal Tribunal.” These changes limited the authority of the Tribunal, placing more power in the hands of City Council. In 2018 the newly elected government largely reversed the 2017 changes. While they opted to keep the new name, the LPAT now largely resembles its predecessor, The Ontario Municipal Board.
Affected parties such as residents groups are able to request “Party Status” allowing them to take part in an appeal. Interested parties may also request “Participant Status” which is more of an observer role in the process. LPAT then has the ability to grant Party and Participant Status. LPAT cases can be resolved through a settlement or a contested hearing. A settlement can be reached through mediation led by the Tribunal or an outside mediator. Contested hearings involve “expert witnesses” and lawyers from each side. Taking the information presented by all Parties into account, the LPAT Chair issues a decision approving, approving with modifications or refusing the application. LPAT decisions can be appealed to the Divisional Court, but this rarely occurs. While there are no rules which prohibit residents’ associations from participating in the process, a contested hearing can cost tens of thousands of dollars which poses a major barrier to participation.
For information on LPAT:
Ontario Citizens Guide to LPAT
To see Planning’s development applications site to locate applications in your neighbourhood:
City of Toronto Development Application Information Centre
RELEVANT DEVELOPMENT POLICY DOCUMENTS
The Official Plan is a planning document which outlines planning policies for the entire City. This includes a citywide “land-use” map which regulates how land can be used and guides the development of the City at a high level. Most of the LPRO Area is designated “Neighbourhoods” which permits low-rise residential development. Yonge Street is primarily designated “mixed-use.” Mixed-use areas permit both commercial and residential development and are intended to accommodate growth. Other parts of LPRO’s area are designated “Parks” which covers most parkland and “Natural Areas” which applies to naturalized spaces such as ravines. The land use map that includes LPRO’s area can be found here.
YONGE-EGLINTON SECONDARY PLAN
The LPRO area is affected by one secondary plan- the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan. A secondary plan is more detailed than the Official Plan and applies to a specific area. The portion of the LPRO affected by the Plan includes Avenue Road to Yonge Street between Briar Hill Avenue and Roselawn Avenue and properties fronting onto Yonge Street between Briar Hill Avenue and Alexandra Blvd. The City engaged in a collaborative process with residents for several years to develop a new secondary plan for the Yonge-Eglinton Area to ensure development occurred in a responsible manner. After the new Plan was approved by City Council in 2018, the Ontario Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing made numerous changes to weaken policies designed to restrict development. This included increasing height limitations and relaxing other policies such as setbacks of new buildings. The Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan as modified by the Minister is now in-force. Additional information can be found here.
AVENUE ROAD STUDY
Adopted in 2009, the Avenue Road Study applies to Avenue Road between Lawrence Avenue West and Wilson Avenue. The Avenue Road Study permits a maximum height of 5 storeys on smaller sites and 7 storeys on larger sites, both subject to angular plane and setback requirements. The Avenue Road Study can be found here.
Development on Yonge Street is evaluated using the “Mid-Rise Guidelines” which apply to a number of “Avenues” across the City that do not have specific studies such as the Avenue Road Study. Avenues are major roads designated for growth in the Official Plan. These Guidelines set out specific performance standards for new buildings including height, angular planes, and setbacks. The Mid-Rise Guidelines can be found here.